Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges ; 19(10): 1521-1523, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1511300
4.
Dermatol Ther ; 33(6): e14516, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-917741

RESUMEN

Since the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there has been an open debate on the impact of biological drugs used in the treatment of psoriasis. To define whether patients under treatment with biologics suffer from increased morbidity and mortality from COVID-19, compared to psoriatic patients treated only with topical drugs, we designed an observational monocentric prevalence study recording the personal and clinical data of psoriatic patients, with focus on the presentation of signs and symptoms related to COVID-19 in the period of time ranging from 1 January 2020 to 31 May 2020. A total of 180 patients were enrolled into two groups: 100 patients in the topical therapy group and 80 patients in the biological therapy group. No statistically significant difference was found between the groups regarding the prevalence of COVID-19 infection and symptoms at a bivariable analysis with adjustment for confounders. In conclusion, psoriatic patients under treatment with biologics do not seem to be more susceptible to COVID-19 compared to other psoriatic patients and we suggest not interrupting treatment with biological drugs, even in areas suffering from active outbreaks of the disease.


Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos/administración & dosificación , COVID-19/epidemiología , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administración & dosificación , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Productos Biológicos/efectos adversos , COVID-19/inmunología , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efectos adversos , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Psoriasis/epidemiología , Psoriasis/inmunología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Dermatol Ther ; 33(6): e14027, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-651971

RESUMEN

During the lockdown period, most planned visits have been postponed and the number of accesses to emergency department (ED) has dramatically reduced. The aim of our study is to analyze the impact of the lockdown on the number, type, and severity of Dermatological ED diagnosis. We performed a retrospective review of all dermatological consultations in the ED of IRCSS San Matteo during the lockdown period in Italy (February 22-May 3 2020) and compared them with those from the same period in 2019. We noticed a sharply reduction in the number of dermatological consultations requested in the ED: from 164 patients in 2019 to 33 in 2020. Some diagnostic categories showed a significant difference with a higher incidence of vasculopathic lesions (0.6% vs 12.1%, P < .0001), urticarial rashes (8.5% vs 21.2%, P = .03), and scabies (3% vs 12.1%, P = .023). We observed an increase in the proportion of patients starting medications, before coming to the ED 26.2% in 2019 vs 66.7% in 2020 (P < .001). Furthermore, we noticed a significant increase in the average complexity of cases presenting to the ED in 2020, as proven by the increased need for biopsies and systemic therapy.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Dermatología/tendencias , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Derivación y Consulta/tendencias , Enfermedades de la Piel/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Piel/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades de la Piel/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA